Session I
Water
Weeds of Montana. Allison
Rowland, Marcy Mack and Peter Rice. National
Bison
Range, 132 Bison Range Road,
Moiese, MT
59824. weedwarrior@excite.com
Aquatic invaders have the potential to impact aquatic habitats and
recreation opportunities in
Montana. The state is currently developing an aquatic nuisance species management
plan. Lake
County, of which ten percent is surface water, has particular concerns about
invasive aquatic plants.
Yellow flag iris (Iris pseudacorus) forms
monocultures in riparian and wetland areas, and seeds spread along
irrigation canals and creeks, clogging ditches and displacing native
wetland plants. It has infested locations along the
Flathead River, and may be in the Clark Fork. Previous control was with glyphosate; we will test other herbicides and
cultural treatments next year.
Flowering
rush (Butomus umbellatus) is in Flathead
Lake
and the
Flathead
River,
and impacts habitat and recreation along lake and river shorelines.
Eurasian water-milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and hydrilla (Hydrilla
verticillata) cause problems in Idaho
and Washington,
and could be present in Montana
waters. Searches will be conducted in Montana
for these plants.
Session
II
Development
of an Integrated Aquatic Plant Mangement Plan for the Box
Canyon
Dam,
Pend
Oreille River. Devin Malkin, Duke Engineering,
Seattle, WA.
As part of its
relicensing efforts at the Box Canyon Hydroelectric Project, the Pend
Oreille PUD No. 1 has committed to the development and
implementation of an Integrated Aquatic Plant Management Plan for
the Box Canyon Reservoir, Pend Oreille River,
Washington. The plan takes into account
diverse stakeholder interests, the identified beneficial uses of the
reservoir, and the efficacy of current and experimental technologies. The plan will incorporate the results of two multi-year studies
funded by the PUD: an evaluation of the local efficacy of water level
drawdown for control of Myriophyllum spicatum, and experimental rearing
and release of milfoil weevils. Successful
implementation of the plan will require the continued cooperation of all
stakeholders.
Aquatic
Plants and Slime We Love to Hate. Harold Ornes, Professor
of Biology and Dean College of Science, Southern Utah
University,
Cedar
City,
UT.
ornes@suu.edu
Some
quick and easy techniques for field identifications of common algae and
macrophytes will be discussed. For
example, suspended, planktonic species of algae vs floating or attached
mats, green algae vs. blue green (cyanobacteria), could affect the
selection of appropriate herbicide. Likewise,
identification of macrophytes and knowing whether they are floating
leaved, submersed, or rooting will affect the selection of appropriate
herbicide and delivery method.
Session III
Purple
Loosestrife Control in CA.
Nate Dechoretz, CA Department of Food and Agriculture. NDechore@cdfa.ca.gov
Over the past
two years, the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) has
conducted a cooperative program to detect and control purple loosestrife
in the San Joaquin/Sacramento Delta Watershed. The program is funded through a three-year grant from CalFed.
Major components of the program include: (a) aggressive outreach
effort; (b) survey, mapping and inventory; (c) integrated control
emphasizing biological and chemical methods; and (d)
monitoring/evaluation. Federal,
state, local agencies, and private organizations provide additional
funding and in-kind support for the program. Small incipient infestations are under eradication. The goal of the program is to prevent the widespread establishments
of this noxious plant in the San Joaquin/Sacramento Delta and adjacent
watersheds.
Managing
Spartina With Glyphosate and Imazapyr.
Kim
Patten, Washington State
University-Long Beach.
2907 Pioneer Rd.
Long Beach,
WA
98631. pattenk@cahe.wsu.edu
Spartina is a noxious weed in west coast estuaries. Chemical
control programs have focused on glyphosate (Rodeo7)
using 5% (v/v) applied at 90
gpa spray volume (18 lb ae/ac)
by hand. Although providing
reasonable control, this methodology doesn’t work on Spartina meadows.
An evaluation of low-volume applications methods for control of
Spartina meadows using glyphosate and imazapyr was made.
Overall, imazapyr consistently out-performed glyphosate under the
range of conditions typically found in an estuary. On Spartina meadows where dry times after applications were >24
hours, excellent efficacy was achieved with glyphosate at 7.5 lbs ae/ac
applied at 10 gal/a. For other sites, however, with reduced dry time,
control was marginal. The
efficacy of imazapyr (0.75 or 1.5 lbs ae/ac), was also influenced by dry
time, but considerably less than glyphosate. Excellent control was
achieved with 1.5 lbs ae/ac of imazapyr applied with spray volumes as low
as 3 gal/ac with long dry times or 10 gal/ac with 6 hours dry time.
Mark
Schwarzländer1 and Patrick Häfliger2,
Shoot
Flies,
Gall
Midges,
and Shoot
and Rhizome
Mining
Moths
Associated
with Common
Reed
(Phragmites australis)
in Europe
and their Potential
for Biological
Control
1Biological
Weed Control Program, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University
of
Idaho,
Moscow, ID
83844-2339
USA,
2CABI Biosciencs
Switzerland
Centre, CH-2800
Delemont,
Switzerland
ABSTRACT Common
reed, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel is a cosmopolitan
grass, that has recently become an invasive in freshwater and brackish
wetlands in
North America
. Particularly along
the Atlantic coast and Washington, P. australis is forming large monospecific stands that replace
native wetland vegetation and provide poor habitat for native biota. The reasons for the rapid spread of P.
australis are unclear. Although
fossil rhizomes of the plant were recently discovered in
North America, the current population explosion is often attributed to accidental
introductions of more competitive genotypes. Regardless of its status as introduced or indigenous, invasions of P. australis are a threat
to biodiversity in natural wetlands and have resulted in aggressive
control attempts. Chemical,
mechanical, and physical control or combinations of these methods can
provide short term success in suppressing P.
australis, however treatments need to be repeated every 3-5 years and
may by themselves have undesirable effects on non-target species.
Twenty eight herbivore species feed on P. australis in
North America. However, only 5 of these insects are native to
North America
whereas 13 species have recently been introduced accidentally.
In contrast to the scarcity of native herbivores feeding on P.
australis in North America, more than 140 insect species feed on P. australis in Europe and Asia Minor and for at least 55 of these
species P. australis is the only
known host plant. During field
surveys in 4 European countries for host specific endophagous herbivores
between 1998-1999 we found more than 20 insect species mining in rhizomes
and/or shoots of P. australis. Nearly all species were shoot flies, gall midges, or moths.
Since these insect groups are considered of lesser potential for
biological control, data on the distribution, abundance, feeding niche and
damage to the host plant were collected in order to evaluate the potential
of each herbivore species. It
is concluded that some of the herbivore species show good potential to
become important control agents for P.
australis in North America.
However, any management
strategy needs to weigh and balance the current negative ecological and
economical impacts of P. australis-invasions
and control attempts against benefits and potential risks of a biological
control program, a process which will require a dialogue of all
stakeholder groups involved.
KEY WORDS
Phragmites
australis, Archanara geminipuncta, Platycephala
planifrons, Lipara,
biological control, common reed
Arundo
donax
Mitigation and Control in Coyote Creek, George
Forni, President,
Aquatic Environments, Inc., gforni@covad.net;
P.O.
Box
1406,
Alamo,
CA. 94507, (925) 314-0831, Fax: (925) 229-2346
Arundo donax, a tall bamboo type plant was imported from its native
India
and planted in areas throughout the
Southwestern US
in an effort to control erosion in harsh
climates devoid of rainfall or adequate ground water. The plant is highly
adaptable and has since then reached epidemic proportions, specifically
throughout riverine and riparian areas within California. Of particular concern is the plants ability to
grow in thick, dense stands, which can alter stream flow and threaten
habitat as well as fixed structures. The plant is spread by rhizome as
well as fragmentation. Arundo has no natural predators and has been
documented in other regions to be in the development phase of a seed base,
although currently not viable. This is a strong indication that the plant
is continuing its adaptation to the host region, making it all the more
difficult to control and or contain. In this particular case, the affected
section of Coyote Creek was contained within the
Santa Clara
County's Park Jurisdiction, but had caused significant
rerouting of the creek in a Cal Trans right of way, destabilizing an large
concrete overcrossing abutment. The riparian zone is primary habitat for
several endangered and threatened species, and impact was to be kept to
the absolute minimum. The project involved the removal of ~4 acres of
Arundo, both by hand and mechanical methods, followed by an aggressive
maintenance program to ensure eradication. The results of both the
mitigation and maintenance programs will be used as a template for future
Arundo donax removal programs within the State.
Influence
of off-season dilute acetic acid treatments on American pondweed winter
buds in a northern California
irrigation canal, David
Spencer, USDA-ARS Exotic & Invasive Weeds Research Unit. dfspencer@ucdavis.edu
American pondweed (Potamogeton
nodosus) is a common weed problem in northern
California
irrigation systems. Previous research has indicated that winter buds are
killed by dilute solutions of acetic acid. Here we report the results of a
field experiment performed to evaluate acetic acid's impact on winter buds
in a canal setting. During March, 2001, when flowing water was absent from
the canal, we treated 50-m sections of a Nevada Irrigation District canal
infested with American pondweed with either 2.5% or 5% solutions of acetic
acid. We compared winter bud survival and growth in samples from the
treated sections with similar samples from untreated portions of the
canal. Cores placed in an outdoor tank and allowed to grow for 11 weeks
showed that no plants emerged and grew from cores collected in the treated
areas while, biomass from untreated samples was about 40 g / core.
Untreated plants also produced new winter buds (20 / core). Relative to
untreated areas American pondweed biomass (five weeks post-treatment) was
reduced by 75% in treated sections of the canal. Sediment pH in treated
sections had returned to pre-treatment values within five weeks. A 2.5%
acetic acid solution was as effective as a 5% solution. American pondweed
from untreated sections of the canal bank invaded the treated area by the
end of the growing season indicating that placement of the material is
important.
Session IV
Lake
Lytle
Milfoil Control
Project: year 2. Rupa
Shrestha (Student), Mark Sytsma,
Center for Lakes and Reservoirs,
Portland
State
University, rupas@pdx.edu
Eurasian
watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum),
a B-listed, noxious aquatic weed in Oregon, invaded Lake Lytle about forty
years ago and degraded the overall quality of the lake, displaced native
plants, and impaired recreational activities.
Sonar
AS
aquatic herbicide was applied to the
lake and its adjoining waterbodies in the summer of 2000 as part of a
three-year integrated aquatic vegetation management plan. The target Sonar
concentration in the lake was 7 to 10 ppb with a contact time of 60 days.
The treatment controlled 95 percent of milfoil in 2000.
An intensive
vegetation survey conducted in spring 2001, revealed that milfoil survived
the Sonar treatment, and occurred in 17 percent of samples collected from
the lake. We were limited to use a non-chemical control method in 2001
because of the requirement of a NPDES permit by the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals, which was not available in
Oregon
. Diver-operated dredging was used to
manage milfoil in the lake in 2001 and was not successful at the level of
infestation present in the lake. Following diver-operated dredging in 2001
milfoil occurred in 50 percent of the vegetation samples. Frequency of
native species, Chara vulgaris
and Utricularia vulgaris decreased
in 2001. Najas flexilis, a
native species that disappeared from the lake after the Sonar treatment in
2000, re-established in the lake with the frequency of 40.5 percent in
2001. Potamogeton richardsonii, a new native plant to
Lake
Lytle
, collected in post-treatment vegetation
sampling in 2000, also expanded coverage in 2001.
The deviation from the management plan, which called for a second
herbicide treatment in 2001 hampered the success of the project.
Non-chemical control methods were not effective at the level of
infestation present. It is likely that another two to three-year herbicide
treatment program will be required to control milfoil in
Lake
Lytle
.
Eurasian
Watermilfoil bio-control
Weevils and Eurasian
Watermilfoil in Washington.
Mariana Tamayo1,
Christian E. Grue1, and Kathy Hamel2, 1WA
Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Aquatic and Fishery
Sciences,
Fishery
Sciences
Building
,
Box
355020
,
University
of
Washington
,
Seattle
,
WA
98195
. 2Water Quality
Program, WA Department of Ecology,
P.O. Box 47600
,
Olympia
,
WA
98504
. mtamayo@u.washington.edu
The milfoil weevil (Euhrychiopsis
lecontei) has shown potential as a biological control of Eurasian
watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum). This native weevil has been associated with
declines of Eurasian watermilfoil in several states including
Vermont
,
Minnesota
, and
Wisconsin
. Researchers in
Vermont
and
Minnesota
have found that the weevil is a watermilfoil specialist and it can
significantly impact Eurasian watermilfoil. The milfoil weevil is present
in
Washington
State
and has currently been detected in 24 waterbodies. During the summers of
2000 and 2001, we conducted a series of laboratory experiments to
determine if the weevil could be reared successfully on Eurasian and
northern watermilfoil (M. sibiricum) from various lakes in
Washington
. In addition, we characterized the aquatic and terrestrial habitats of 30
lakes to determine if differences exist between the lakes with weevils and
those where they have not been detected. Results from both studies will be
presented.
Phrenology
and
Impacts
of Egeria
Densa
in a Drinking
Water
Reservpoir.
Toni G. Pennington and Mark D. Sytsma, Portland State University, Center
for Lakes and Reservoirs, ESR/PO BOX 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751.
toni@pdx.edu
An examination of the seasonal phenological changes in Egeria
densa (Brazilian elodea) and its potential impact to a drinking water
reservoir in
Oregon
began in 2001. To determine seasonal
phenological changes in E. densa,
plants were sampled monthly, separated into various plant parts and
analyzed for carbon, nitrogen, and total nonstructural carbohydrates.
Preliminary data indicate relatively high percent N (up to 5 percent) in
apical meristems of E.
densa compared to other plant parts considered in this study and other
aquatic angiosperms. Seasonal variation in N content of apical meristems
was similar to that in
Southeastern US
plants, however
Oregon
plants did not senesce during the winter of 2001.
Nitrogen content in double node regions and root crowns varied
little by seasonal (2.3 to 4.0 percent and 2.4 to 3.2 percent,
respectively). To investigate the potential impacts of E.
densa infestation in a drinking water reservoir, monthly water samples
were collected and analyzed for dissolved organic carbon and for total
trihalomethanes (TTHMs) after 0 and 7d incubation.
Due to increased contact time between chlorine
and water, TTHM levels generally increased two-fold over the 7d
incubation period, suggesting significant THM formation potential in the
sourcewater. Greenhouse investigations are planned to elucidate the role
of E. densa in forming carcinogenic THM precursors in drinking water
reservoirs.
Precision
Release*, Advancements In Product Formulation Technology for
Sonar*Herbicide.
Mark Mongin, Mike Netherland, SePRO Corporation,
Carmel
,
IN
; Shaun Hyde,
SePRO Corporation, Folsom, CA, shaunh@sepro.com
Since the commercial introduction of Sonar aquatic herbicide in
1986,
Lake
Managers
have strived to utilize the new tool in a variety of aquatic site
situations. Water bodies with heavy
flow or high rates of dilution are especially challenging for the
utilization of conventional Sonar SRP (Slow Release Pellet).
Measuring the concentration of Sonar coming off of the SRP pellet
was also very difficult, as detectable concentrations were seldom present
in values useful for decision making. Sonar*
Precision Release* was developed to provide a faster, more predictable
release of fluridone in convenient and economical to apply pellet
formulation. This results in
improved consistency of weed control in aquatic systems with measurable
water flow rates that may cause herbicide dilution.
Improved efficacy can also be expected where target plant
populations require a higher threshold dose of fluridone.
Sonar Precision Release possesses a unique release profile.
With a faster release than current SRP formulations and
longer-lasting residuals than Sonar A.S., Sonar Precision Release delivers
enhanced performance in difficult treatment sites. *Trademark
of SePRO Corporation
Aqua-Kleen
2.4,D Aquatic Herbicide Update, Chris
Davis and David Cragin,
Ph.D, Cerexagri,
Inc.
Understanding the potential heath and safety aspects of
aquatic pesticides is critical
for using them safely and legally. Labels
and Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) are a key source of this type of
information. They can help
applicators properly handle and apply products, as well pinpoint potential
hazards in the event of spills or accidental exposures.
The label contains a set of instructions in the effective use of
the product, including appropriate use rates and timings for target weed
species and water conditions, and also requirements for protective
equipment, first aid, and how to dispose of empty containers and unwanted
residual product. The MSDS provides a more detailed description of the
possible hazards for a chemical in order to help you protect your health
and the environment. Since
there are relatively few aquatic herbicides, learning about the potential
hazards they pose is an achievable task and the best way to minimize
potential risks.
Diquat
Dibromide: Toxic
Pesticide or Medicine? A Real Case for Safety Margins and
Perceptions using an Aquatic Herbicide.
Petta,
J. F. and D. Tierney, Syngenta Crop Protection,
Greensboro
,
NC
,
jim.petta@syngenta.com.
Diquat dibromide has been used for aquatic weed
management for over 35 years in the
United States
. As part of the registration and
re-registration process under FIFRA, numerous studies have been submitted
to the Environmental Protection Agency to substantiate the safety margins
as required under the law. Additionally,
the registrant (Syngenta Crop Protection) is required by law to submit any
negative claims made against the product concerning any potential problems
such as fish kills or other off-target effects.
To date, no negative effects have been reported to either Syngenta
or to the EPA from Syngenta as no reports have been received.
However, in spite of this information, questions persist as to the
potential toxicity to aquatic vertebrates such as salmonids.
At the same time as these questions are raised on herbicidal use,
fish hatcheries have been using diquat dibromide under an Experimental
Permit system since 1992 as a fish protectant/medicine at rates up to 20x
of the herbicidal use rates. Diquat
dibromide is applied in fish hatcheries for the control of three very
serious diseases of fish. These
diseases include Columnaris disease (Flavbobacterium
columnare), coldwater disease (Flavobacterium
psychrophila), and bacterial gill disease (Flavobacterium
branchiophila). Currently, the
treated fish include musky, northern pike, large and smallmouth bass,
bluegill, walleye, and catfish at the fingerling growth stage.
New species to be tested include salmonids where coldwater disease
and bacterial gill disease are serious diseases of coho salmon.
There have been no reported adverse physical or behavioral
reactions after treatment for any test species or life stage.
The use of diquat dibromide has resulted in fish very high survival rates
versus the untreated. This
paper attempts to bridge the apparent gap in perceived toxicity as an
aquatic herbicide and the use in fish hatcheries for disease control.
Session IV
Assessment
of treatments to eradicate the marine algal invader Caulerpa taxifolia
in
California
:
Using Sediment Cores as indicators.
Lars
Anderson, USDA- Univ. of California – Davis,
lwanderson@ucdavis.edu
The non-native marine alga Caulerpa
taxifolia was discovered in a small San Diego Lagoon in June, 2000,
the first such known introduction in the northern hemisphere. This plant
has spread in the Mediterranean waters from a few square meters in the
mid-1980's to over 5,000 ha presently. It
displaces native sea grasses, covers a variety of bottom habitats
and has recently spread to
Australia
as well.
An eradication program was initiated within weeks of the San Diego
discovery through the auspices of Southern
California Caulpera Control Team (SCCAT) and has relied upon liquid and
pelleted chlorine applied beneath PVC tarps used to seal off colonies of
the alga. To assess effectiveness, beginning Dec. 2001, 4in.dia by 20cm
sediment cores were removed from several tarped and treated sites as well
as "control" cores from
areas within the lagoon that neither had C. taxifolia nor were
treated in any way. Within 24 h of
removal, cores were placed in "instant Ocean" in grow-out
conditions (20C; 240 umols/m2/sec coolwhite fluroesent light; LD:
14:10
) and any re-growth was noted.
To affirm adequate growing conditions, "control" cores
were inoculated with live explants of C. taxifolia.
No C. taxifolia emerged in cores from treated sites 45 days
later. Inoculated C.
taxifolia elongated, produced new thalli prodigiously in
"control" cores. Seedling
native eelgrass also emerged from several cores from treated sites. This method
appears promising for assessing control and eradication methods for
submersed aquatic plant target species.
Giant
Salvinia Control With Clearigate Aquatic Herbicide On The
Lower Colorado River
.
PAUL
WESTCOTT, Applied Biochemists-Surface Water Division, Advantis
Technologies, Inc.,
Phoenix
,
AZ
paulwestcott@appliedbiochemists.com,
Giant Salvinia (Salvinia molesta) is a free-floating aquatic fern
native to
South America
. It is an aggressive,
invasive species capable of forming dense mats on the waters’ surface,
rapidly spreading by vegetative fragments.
Giant Salvinia was found in the Imperial Wildlife Refuge on the
Lower Colorado River
in August 1999. The source of
the infestation was determined to be the outfall drain from the Palo Verde
Irrigation District (PVID) near
Blythe
,
CA
. The PVID outfall drain collects
agricultural runoff and tailwater from the irrigated farmland and returns
it to the
Colorado River
. A number of aquatic herbicides
were evaluated for efficacy and suitability based upon site
characteristics, water use, and growth conditions.
The water quality and dense, overhanging growth of emergent
vegetation within the drain presented some major challenges to control
efforts. An operational control
program for Giant Salvinia under these conditions was initiated in
September 2001 utilizing Clearigate, based upon the evaluation results and
its unique formulation characteristics.